This is all thanks to digital audio technology and VST software. Today, the creation of music using different instruments can be done at the touch of a button. We may earn money or products from the companies mentioned in this post through our independently chosen links, which earn us a commission. Information - Concerts, News,FAQs, Archives. Organs - Electronic (B3 etc.), Pipe, Theatre.
#Swam engine review professional#
Who's Who - Professional Pianists on Piano World Member Recordings - Non Classical Pianist CornerĮVENTS! Piano Concerts, Recitals, Competitions.įun Stuff! - Parties, Tours, Projects & More.įorum Members Parties, Tours, Cruises, & M. MY NEW PIANO or KEYBOARD! - Share Your Story! They also have some other components to transition between let's say sax grawl and sax normal sound.ĭigital Pianos - Electronic Pianos - Synths &a. They probably alight these phase of these elements and do some morphinig tricks so the portamento sounds smooth. Samples of the origina and destination notes have different ADSR components thus it is hard to alight them and the resulting transition from these algorithms wont sound smooth. Portamento function requires smooth transition between two samples. They have addressed few issues with sample based sytnehsis. Nothing rocket-science like VL1 and MOSS. I guess it's purely sample based with some tricks. VL1 is a physical modelling : Yamaha implemented a wave guide simulation which is a finite elements simulation of a wind instrument. Ivory has some resonance modelling like Clavinova (VRM), then it is quite near pure sampling, but with a bit of modelling, SWAM is Modified samples, Pianoteq is pure modelling, but I don’t think it is really a physical modelling.
I mean by physical modelling, the description of the physical instrument in order to compute the sound, not the description of key characteristics of the sound.Ī Kontakt library is pure sampling, but the use of script makes them more difficult to classify. I suppose there are 3 levels : pure sampling, modified samples, pure modelling (physical modelling or not). But the role of physical modelling is not clear. The samples are the raw material which is heavily transformed. The SWAM engine combines concepts of Physical Modeling and Behavioral Modeling with the Multi-Vector/Phase-Synchronous Sample-Morphing technique. They use samples as the main source for the sound and I don't think SWAM produces the tones using physical modeling. Or processing samples, which is done on Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) built into digital pianos.Īnd just for starters: The best modeling implementation available is not some iOS app, it's Roland's V-Piano. Like rendering 3D graphics, which is done on GPUs. GPCPUs are pretty fast at doing almost anything, but they are slow on doing specific tasks. The latter is due to the fact they're limited to run on General Purpose CPUs. The entire discussion based on fact, that people don't understand how modern DSP sound synthesis with sample memory works and that PCs sample libraries don't represent the state of the art hardware synthesis technology. Unless I am misunderstanding what I have read and seen. With sampling you are replaying a recording of vibrato, for example, whereas with modeling the vibrato is recreated each time from scratch and the algorithms can still be improved. Sampling, otoh, has pretty much reached it’s limit.
In my mind it seems rather obvious, when you hear the quality of these instruments, especially the strings, that if modeling does not offer 100% emulation at the moment, that future developments will bring it ever closer. I hope there will be no hostile engagement about the superiority of sampling. It is an amazing and long awaited development that some of these instruments will now be released on the iPad/iOS platform at $15 each! Obviously, not the same as desktop, but it will advance iOS acoustic authenticity to a new level.
#Swam engine review full#
Their full line up is still incomplete and costs over five grand, I believe, Their expensive acoustic emulations are certainly malleable and super expressive.Įach SWAM instrument costs $100-250. The Italian company, Audio Modeling, was founded in 2017. That debate may be tilting as modeling becomes more sophisticated. There is regular discussion here whether sampling is better than modeling.